Derry 4 case against Chief Constable settles

28 January 2019

This morning a press conference was held at the Pat Finucane Centre with the Derry Four. The men announced that they have accepted a significant out of court settlement from the Chief Constable in respect of their miscarriage of justice case.

Statement read by Gerry McGowan on behalf of the Derry Four

"On behalf of the Derry Four we would like to thank our solicitor Patricia Coyle and those at Harte, Coyle Collins who have been with us since 1998 and helped secured our acquittal 20 years ago.

We would like to thank Paul O’Connor and Sara Duddy from the Pat Finucane Centre, and all their colleagues over the years who have supported us.

We thank our families who have endured this painful injustice with us over the past forty years. They have stood by us throughout, and we remember our loved ones who are not here today.

We have endured a number of dark days over the past forty years. It has taken it toll on our health and our families, but we are now looking forward.

This compensation will not undo the years of hurt and pain inflicted on us and our families, however it allows us to look to the future and we feel some sense of closure that the State is finally acknowledging their wrongdoing.

Finally we would like to thank the people of Derry who have stood by us over the past forty years, and never doubted our innocence."

Derry 4










At the start of this conference I would like to set out the factual background and history which brings us here today.


Stephen Crumlish, Gerry McGowan, Gerry Kelly and Michael Toner,  all from Circular Road in the Creggan area of Derry, were arrested between the 26th and 28th February in 1979.  At the time of their arrests 2 were 17 years of age, and 2 were 18 years old.  They were detained in Strand Road Police Holding Centre for up to 3 days.  During that detention period they had no access to lawyers, legal advice, parents or family members. 


All 4 allege they were wrongfully arrested and subjected to physical and verbal ill treatment by the RUC interviewing officers during a rigorous schedule of interviews designed to sap their respective wills.  Gerry McGowan was subjected to threats of physical violence in relation to his family including his sister. 


While in police detention in these oppressive circumstances, all 4 young men signed false confessions in relation to the murder of Lt Stephen Kirby on the 14th February 1979 at Wapping Lane at the bottom of Abercorn Road.  They also signed false confessions in relation to 4 knee-capping incidents in Derry for which no other persons had been charged or prosecuted.   


My clients were entirely innocent of all these offences. 


On the sole basis of the false confession evidence obtained in these oppressive circumstances they were charged to court and remanded in custody to Crumlin Road jail.  They remained in custody for up to 6 weeks until granted bail by the High Court in Belfast.  They were then subject to onerous bail conditions for over a year including reporting to police on a daily basis and curfews.  The trial against them commenced at Belfast Crown Court on the 13th October 1980. 


At the time of their prosecution enormous efforts were made on their behalf by their families, friends, community activists, local priests and politicians and the people of Derry to stop the false prosecution against them.  All 4 clients complied with a lie detector test arranged by Mr Toner's father with a US expert.  All 4 passed the test.  the results were submitted to the Director of Public Prosecutions in Northern Ireland together with a large volume of letters from local clergy and politicians including Bishop Edward Daly who had conducted his own grass roots enquiries.  Despite these efforts the prosecution continued. 


The trial commenced at Belfast Crown Court on the 13th October 1980.  During the course of the trial they were, unusually, admitted to bail.  After 2 days of the trial, the Derry 4, as they had then become known, received advice from lawyers and family members that in light of the Diplock Court system with Judges sitting alone, their defence was futile.  At the ages of 18 and 19 all 4 left Derry for the Republic and a life in exile.  On the 16th October 1980 Belfast Crown Court issued Bench Warrants for their arrest on sight.  For the next 20 years they lived their lives under the shadow of the most serious and grave false allegation with active Bench Warrants from a court in Belfast hanging over their heads.


In 1996, through the efforts of his brothers Gerard and Eamonn, I met with Michael Toner in Buncrana in Donegal.  The memory of that meeting is crystal clear.  Michael Toner was so traumatised by the events in Strand Road 17 years previously that he could barely discuss the detail.  I took instructions from Michael and the other clients and over the coming months made representations to the Director of Public Prosecutions.  In December 1998 the Director of Public Prosecutions confirmed in writing that, having reviewed the case,  he did not intend to offer any evidence on any charge against any of my 4 clients. 


On the 21st December 1998 Stephen Crumlish, Gerry McGowan, Gerry Kelly and Michael Toner were found not guilty of the murder of Lt Stephen Kirby and all other charges on the  direction of the Lord Chief Justice Robert Carswell at the Royal Courts of Justice, Belfast.  That acquittal was followed in 1999 by a further direction by the Director of the Public Prosecution Service that there would be no prosecution for the alleged breach of bail in leaving Northern Ireland in 1980 for the Republic.


The 1998 directed acquittals simply confirmed without doubt the innocence of my clients.  What they did not have however was the truth about how this miscarriage of justice had occurred.  They have now spent a further 20 years searching for that truth. 


In 2000 we issued Writs in the High Court in Belfast against the Chief Constable for wrongful arrest, false imprisonment,  assault and battery,  trespass to the person and malicious prosecution on behalf of all 4 clients.


In 2003 Paul O Connor and Sara Duddy of the Pat Finucane Centre lodged complaints to the Office of the Police Ombudsman in Northern Ireland on behalf of all 4 clients.  Paul will deal with the outcome of those complaints which included the commissioning of expert linguistic evidence which supported our mutual clients' complaints.


In the civil proceedings we relentlessly pursued the factual information surrounding the original police investigation.  In pursuit of that information we lodged Specific Discovery Requests with the court against not only the Chief Constable but also the DPP/now the PPS, the Department of Justice, the Northern Ireland Office,  the Security Service/M15 and the Garda Commissioner. 


The discovery process in these cases involved over 21 court reviews before a Judge in the High Court.  During one of these hearings in September 2106 we were advised that all the police interview notes in relation to the 3 of the clients were missing.  In April 2018 we obtained a Court Order directing the Chief Constable to comply with our discovery requests.  In May 2018 we received several volumes of discovery materials.  Those documents gave us some but not all of the truth in this case. 


What those documents told us was that;


  1. In January 1991, 12 years after the clients had left Northern Ireland,  a senior lawyer in the DPP directed that all the police interview notes and records and the original confession statements be subjected to ESDA tests to check their authenticity.  ESDA testing is a forensic test which checks whether documents have been re-written or corrupted in any way.  This prosecution direction in my opinion was very unusual and normally defence territory.
  2. From January 1991 to October 1992 searches were conducted by police both locally and at Headquarters for the murder investigation file and the original police interview notes on which the prosecution lawyer had directed forensic testing.  Internal police reports which were provided to us in May 2018 confirm that the original file and documents were last stored by a police officer involved in the original investigation in 1979 in a locker room in the CID section of Strand Road police station in 1985.  That police officer had no explanation for the current whereabouts of the original file including the court Bench Warrants and the police interview notes. 
  3. In October 1992 the same senior lawyer in the DPP decided that this prosecution could not proceed.  One of the reasons for this decision was the fact that the majority of the original documents including police interview notes were not available for forensic testing to check their authenticity.  The original Bench Warrants issued by the Court were also missing.
  4. My clients instruct that they can reasonably infer that the original documents may have been deliberately destroyed once the legal direction to have them forensically tested issued,
  5. In reaching the no prosecution the same lawyer however referred to "other anomalies" in the prosecution case.  We do not know today what those other anomalies are but our own enquires have led us to raise formal questions with the Chief Constable as to whether any of the interviewing officers involved in this case were discredited in the July 1992 appeals in the UDR4 case.
  6. The prosecution decision in October 1992 was never communicated to either my clients or their original lawyers who were still practising in Derry at the time.  Nor has any explanation ever been provided for this omission.  My clients continued to live for a further 6 years under the shadow of the murder allegation in exile away from their families.  The directed acquittals in 1998 before the Crown Court were the result of their own proactive efforts.
  7. The documents served in May 2018 also included a statement of evidence from a direct eye witness in relation to the vehicle which was used in the shooting of Lt Kirby.  That witness gave a statement to police in another jurisdiction on the 15th October 1980, at the time of the trial,  that he had absolutely no knowledge of Messrs Crumlish, Kelly, McGowan and Toner nor any connection between them and the shooting of Lt Kirby. The same witness had also made a statement to police on the 14th February 1979 identifying the person who took the vehicle he believed was used in the shooting.  Both the police and the DPP had access to both these statements from this witness from 1980.  It took 38 years and a High Court Order compelling compliance before the second statement from this witness was disclosed to my 4 clients. 
  8. the other important documents provided to my clients in May 2018 included over 40 civilian alibi witness statements which placed all of them somewhere else at the time of the shooting of Lt Kirby. These were provided to the police by family members, friends and independent witnesses at the time of the clients' arrests in February 1979.  An internal police report confirms the concerns between the volume and calibre of the alibi statements and the contradictory confessions particularly in relation to the murder allegation. 

This Press Conference is being held today because the upshot of the civil action is an out of Court settlement to each of my clients by the Chief Constable.  This settlement comes with no acceptance of liability on the part of the police.  But my clients refused to accept a confidentiality condition as part of this settlement.  Whatever the Chief Constable's position on responsibility, my clients are free to discuss the content of the documents provided to them throughout the civil proceedings and the discovery process and the reasonable inferences and conclusions that they now draw from those documents.  While some questions remain unanswered the payment of a significant sum of compensation to each of these gentlemen by the Chief Constable is a final vindication and correction of the public record. 


The fact of the compensation payments and the payments themselves provide recognition for my clients of the wrongs visited upon them in Strand Road Holding Centre in 1979 and go some way in making up for the reputational damage suffered by my clients for some 40 years.  My clients view these payments as recognition of their innocence.  A recognition which is critical to their individual and collective ability to now move on with their lives.  The police and the criminal justice system in Northern Ireland throughout the Diplock Court and emergency law years no doubt made mistakes whether deliberate or inadvertent.  The message is that if you are going to arrest innocent citizens for offences they did not commit it is going to be expensive.


In 1980 at the requests of family members, the Brehon Law Society in New York reviewed the prosecution case and produced a report which concluded that the prosecution was a "tapestry of fantasy and fiction".  That is perhaps the best description of what these gentlemen endured.  It is a great pity that it has taken 40 years to get to this point.  I would like to take this opportunity to commend my clients for their collective tenacity in pursuing and establishing their innocence in a justice system which was weighted against them and to their families,  friends and the fearless campaigners for their unwavering support.